Satellite TV vs. Cable TV, which is better?

PeterAB
Posts: 90
Joined: 2006-11-07
Dad Points: 158

Hi guys - as a relatively new immigrant here I'm finding the subject of TV service providers a little tricky to decipher (nothing like the four channels I'm used, BBC1, BBC2, BBC3 and BBC4!!). 

I just can't believe how expensive our cable provider (Comcast) is - we fork out $75 a month for a package just one above the basic (and no, before you ask, there are no adult channels - we get High Speed Internet, after all!). A recent poker night left me with no option other than to seriously think about the satellite alternative and with that come some apprehensions and plenty of questions. 

So, I called AT&T about their Directv service and drilled the guy and it all seems to add up, alike-for-like service, similar channels and quantity, the only difference is there's a small dinner plate on top of our house. We'd even get a bundle discount with our existing home phone service so in terms of cost, we'd effectively halve the cost of TV. Allegedly outages are less than cable providers and the signal quality is enough to satisfy HDD TV's (irrelevant in our case). The dish (18") seems small enough to be potentially unobtrusive / unsightful and the switch over between providers is apparently straight-forward, taking an hour or two. The only blemish is an obligation for a 24 month contract (although they reinstall for free if you move) but assuming that all the above is true, this could be a mute point. 

I'd have no interest in switching Internet providers - I've heard enough negative news about AT&T's service in this regard.

Am I missing something? Does anyone have first-hand experience in this matter? And additionally, is Dish better than Directv or should we just throw our TV in the dumpster and forget it all! It seems silly to be spending quite so much more money for nothing less than vanity (we're that surrounded by dishes in our block that I'm sure we're the last cable clients..)

All thoughts / suggestions very welcome, even if there just generic. 




omniplex
Posts: 9
Joined: 2009-01-13
Dad Points: 9
Not an Answer..

We have comcast, and for cable, the price your paying is about right. Comcast does offer on demand which I am not sure how Dish or Direct TV compete with that. I believe they have something similar, but I have no direct usage of either. At the moment and last time i checked, the theory was that comcast HD sucked because they compressed to much to squeeze the HD channels into the data streams.  One reason I have not switched to Satellite or FiOS ( which is available ) is that comcast carries Sprout. FiOS has Sprout as well but I have to sign a two year contract. I'm forking out about $125 just above basic and cable internet.

Your mileage will vary, but about half the houses in my neighborhood have satellite dishes, some with two. Half of those houses have cable TV service as well as Satellite.

Best advice, do what you did, check the channel line up, check the features and services for things you want or don't want, and decide on which one to pay for.  In most areas, satellite is no more problematic then cable, and vice versa.



JohnGilroy
Posts: 418
Joined: 2007-04-26
Dad Points: 670
Ditch Cable*

See if you can survive until the Fall. Get a netflix subscription and buy DVDs for the kids with the money you save. 90% of the TV you want to watch is on sites like hulu.com anyway

*unless you are a sports fan



chitownman
chitownman's picture
Posts: 223
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 311
My Two Cents

Hi Peter and welcome to the site and the States.  I have looked at upgrading to DirecTV myself as I am a huge American Football fan and it is the only way to guarantee to see all of the games that my team plays in.  The hard part is attempting to prove to my wife that with inclement weather that there would not be a loss of signal. 

In regards to cable, we have digital cable service with Cox Cable who has a monopoly here in Omaha NE.  We have four digital converter boxes plus one has a digital video recorder capabilities as well.  Plus we have high speed internet (definitely a lot better the DSL) plus our phone with Cox as well.  We are paying roughly $205 per month for having everything we would want including the tier with Sprout, Noggin et al.  Still not happy about the high cost however, we are stuck as there is not another competitor to compete with Cox.  I would like to switch to DirecTV however, do not think it will ever happen.



DomsDad
DomsDad's picture
Posts: 11
Joined: 2009-01-13
Dad Points: 15
My 2 1/2 Cents

Welcome Peter, and Hello Chitown,

I have had both cable tv/internet, and sat tv combo with our local phone company Windstream. The cable is almost a guarantee of no problems during bad weather, unless there is a power outage or tree across the lines. Internet offers super fast speeds, faster than DSL but I don’t need anything higher than 3Mbs anyway. Price wise its about the same, from when I had cable tv/internet. I want to say I paid around $180 a month but this was about 4 years ago. And I worked for the cable company at the time.

I have the combo of Dish Network “top250” that covers you locals, along with your favs like USA, TNT, all the cartoon, noggin, nick and disneys. Plus all the movies, HBO, Skinamax, TMC, Encore, and so on, no adult stuff. 4 ESPN channels, NFL, and MLB channel for the sportsman in me. I have two boxes total, one box in my oldest daughters’ room (standard box), along with a DVR box that controls 2 TVs both the living room and our bedroom. Couldn’t live without the DVR for sure, lets the kids watch a movie or show they want while I may be busy doing something else while my show is recording in the background. As for interruptions during storms,Chitown, tell the wife the only times I have ever lost signal is when it’s near tornado or very severe thunderstorm type of weather. Even when we do lose it, as soon as the worst of it blows over, it comes back in. The only down side is when there is a storm, you want to be able to see the locals to know whats going on, this is the only issue I ever have with it, but thats when i just pull out the radio and listen. This was the first time I ever had satellite but being in a very rural area I didn’t have much choice other than rabbit ears and tin foil. Our DSL is highest available in our area at 3Mbs, would like more but that’s all I can get for now. Along with our home phone in the package with continental LD so the other half can call her family in Texas, I think it’s a steal at $90 for the phone and DSL side, and about $120 for the satellite TV.

A lot of people I have talked to said they had a lot of issues with loss of signal, I think it has to do with installation. If it’s put on a pole out in the middle of the yard, its going to catch a lot of wind and blow it around, also if there are a lot of trees and branches that can get in the way of its line of site. Mine is mounted to the back corner of my roof. No problems with trees, its bolted down and sealed with silicon, no leaks or any problems going on 4 years now. Even a year we had six inches of snow sitting in the middle of the dish, no problems. Never thought twice about the agreement thing, figured I could live with it for 2 years even if I needed to just lower it to a 20 dollar plan for the remainder of the agreement.

Maybe this was more like 3 1/2 cents but I'm a little long winded anyway.

Hope this helps,

Justin

 



bitchen
bitchen's picture
Posts: 7
Joined: 2009-01-13
Dad Points: 7
DirecTv

You can truely exhaust yourself evaluating all the options available. I have been a DirecTv subscriber and am quite happy with the service. If you like sports, there is no other choice. And there is substantial amounts of international programming. The on-demand is weak because you have to download, but the HD is hard to beat (although the competion is catching up). The loss of signal does happen a couple of times a year. Only when a storm front comes through, so it only lasts a couple of minutes. The ATT bundle is quite new (they used to offer Dish). I would take advantage if I could get internet.



brianc
brianc's picture
Posts: 361
Joined: 2006-11-02
Dad Points: 433
We have Comcast Cable...

As of now we are bundled with high speed internet, phone and cable TV for 114.00/mo. The TV package we have is digital and includes all channels up to 100. That's about 92 more channels than we watch! But, since more Cub games are on Comcast than WGN this year, and somehow my wife and I have become addicted to HGTV...

Thanks for bringing the topic up Peter. I am always pondering the switch and will canvass the area here to see which is better.

 

Brian



Mr. Dad
Posts: 206
Joined: 2008-03-07
Dad Points: 295
Had DirecTV have Cable now

We just moved in January and we switched to Time Warner Cable from DirecTV.  We did this because it appeared cheaper to bundle internet, phone, and cable.  However we had to upgrade cable to get all the kiddie channels and now we are at about the same as when we were unbundled.

As far as reception for DirecTV...  It usually only goes out during the most extreme rainstorms.  We never lose it in a snowstorm.  In the summer it maybe goes out a handful of times, and only for a short time typically.  We have a DVR so when it happens we just turn a show we have recorded.

DirecTV was way more user friendly, and the DVR was much better for recording shows.  The dish is not very big and so many others have them that it no longer looks out of place.  I will be switching back to DirecTV before the NFL season starts.  Unless you want to watch all NFL games (which you pay extra for) Dish and DirecTV are about the same, except I think Dish maybe offers Internet too in some areas. 



AMR
AMR's picture
Posts: 116
Joined: 2007-11-06
Dad Points: 143
A bit off topic, but . . .

How often do you guys find yourselves saying, "You know, back in the day TV was free and there was no such thing as high speed internet. How much was the phone bill? $30 a month? $40?"

Now, we're all paying over $100 (we're a $175 for a digital phone, digital cable w/ all the on demand crap but no movies and high speed TWC family). That's a lot of coin. What's more -- think of the number of families who can't afford these services but are paying them anyway. And on top of that, there's this little thing called a cell phone to think about . . .

Yeah, there's a lot of cool stuff in our world, but it's all so expensive.



DomsDad
DomsDad's picture
Posts: 11
Joined: 2009-01-13
Dad Points: 15
If only

In the past I worked for Sprint PCS, I had Cable TV and internet so I decided to not have a home phone at all. I had my cell phone at a discount along with the TV and internet as a bundle. Now with not having cable available, my internet is DSL through the phone, so this is no longer an option.

Like AMR said, I remember having the choice of a whopping 4 channels, now to have those channels some of us have to pay for those too. And back then it would have been, "whats an internet?"



dadonfire
Posts: 17
Joined: 2007-08-30
Dad Points: 42
I've had Mediacom, Comcast,

I've had Mediacom, Comcast, DTV (dish) and now AT&T Uverse.  Uverse rocks.  It was installed the day we moved in, and has been flawless for nearly a year now.

A lot of good comments have been made already.  I'll add a few of the reasons why I will never again have dish based TV:

1.  When it snows, rains heavily, is very windy, or otherwise significantly inclement, your dish will not work.  So on those crappy days when you're stuck at home, you'll be without TV.

2.  If you're comparing internet, the Dish based internet blows.  It is far, far slower than the comparable Cable based internet.

Again, if Uverse is available, you should look into it.  I'm not an AT&T employee or shareholder...but the TV is great, the service has been perfect, the internet is BLAZINGLY fast, and I couldn't be happier.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.